<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPs &#8211; the currency of survival</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotonut.com/2008/09/06/usps-the-currency-of-survival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2008/09/06/usps-the-currency-of-survival/</link>
	<description>Creative resources for all pro photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: damien</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2008/09/06/usps-the-currency-of-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-5837</link>
		<dc:creator>damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=547#comment-5837</guid>
		<description>Hi Fiona,

Yes it is entirely posable to be like all the others and be successful. However to be brilliant USPs are the ticket. They are what separates you and your brand from mediocrity. It&#039;s best not to confuse consistency with USPs. USPs don&#039;t mean quirky, irregular or inconsistent. A USP for Mercedes S class might be perfect consistency with remarkably low failure rates. It&#039;s this USP that will trigger purchase decisions. Without it a buyer might opt for a BMW or Audi. The key brands in my life have USPs and it&#039;s these USPs that add the magic. Apple versus Acer. They both make computers but Apple can charge a lot more for their product because of the USPs. Of course my thoughts here are only opinions and Malcolm must have many success stories of non USP businesses. 

It&#039;s good to raise these points and open discussion. Thanks again,

Damien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fiona,</p>
<p>Yes it is entirely posable to be like all the others and be successful. However to be brilliant USPs are the ticket. They are what separates you and your brand from mediocrity. It&#8217;s best not to confuse consistency with USPs. USPs don&#8217;t mean quirky, irregular or inconsistent. A USP for Mercedes S class might be perfect consistency with remarkably low failure rates. It&#8217;s this USP that will trigger purchase decisions. Without it a buyer might opt for a BMW or Audi. The key brands in my life have USPs and it&#8217;s these USPs that add the magic. Apple versus Acer. They both make computers but Apple can charge a lot more for their product because of the USPs. Of course my thoughts here are only opinions and Malcolm must have many success stories of non USP businesses. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to raise these points and open discussion. Thanks again,</p>
<p>Damien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2008/09/06/usps-the-currency-of-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-5802</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=547#comment-5802</guid>
		<description>Hey 

Thanks Damien, good post! I hope you don&#039;t mind me being contrary, however, but when I got my brand identity and logo designed, my branding guru - the awesome Malcolm Casimir of Butterfly London - advised me that he didn&#039;t believe in usps. His argument was that the identity must be consistent throughout the brand and that if it&#039;s right people will want to buy into that. I&#039;d be interested to know what other people think. 

Fiona</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey </p>
<p>Thanks Damien, good post! I hope you don&#8217;t mind me being contrary, however, but when I got my brand identity and logo designed, my branding guru &#8211; the awesome Malcolm Casimir of Butterfly London &#8211; advised me that he didn&#8217;t believe in usps. His argument was that the identity must be consistent throughout the brand and that if it&#8217;s right people will want to buy into that. I&#8217;d be interested to know what other people think. </p>
<p>Fiona</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce Walston</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2008/09/06/usps-the-currency-of-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>Royce Walston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=547#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>This is great content and something that has me rethinking my approach.  Thanks for the great post and wonderful blog.  I am sure I will be spending many hours here over the next several days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great content and something that has me rethinking my approach.  Thanks for the great post and wonderful blog.  I am sure I will be spending many hours here over the next several days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovegrove Consulting blog &#187; Instant inspiration 5</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2008/09/06/usps-the-currency-of-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovegrove Consulting blog &#187; Instant inspiration 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=547#comment-285</guid>
		<description>[...] Want to know more about establishing a brand? Start by reading this post on USP&#8217;s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Want to know more about establishing a brand? Start by reading this post on USP&#8217;s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

