<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 580EX11 &amp; Canon 430EX11 what&#8217;s it to be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/</link>
	<description>Creative resources for all pro photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:30:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Giddings</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Giddings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>H Damien

Thanks for taking the time out to reply to that. I thought it was a secret military communication network first of all. Yes I am just looking for a reliable trigger for flash, I did find the Will Chung article and was pleased at the result he gave them and I was looking for a &quot;second&quot; vote of confidence in them (although to be fair he also points out their limitations compared to the PWs).  Am popping in the WEX shop  tomorrow so will have a better look.

Thanks again and all the best.

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H Damien</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time out to reply to that. I thought it was a secret military communication network first of all. Yes I am just looking for a reliable trigger for flash, I did find the Will Chung article and was pleased at the result he gave them and I was looking for a &#8220;second&#8221; vote of confidence in them (although to be fair he also points out their limitations compared to the PWs).  Am popping in the WEX shop  tomorrow so will have a better look.</p>
<p>Thanks again and all the best.</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damien</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>Hi Martin, I have no idea what a &#039;secureline twinlink t2d&#039; is. My first guess would be a fishing reel. So I had to look it up on Google and WEX came up top. It looks great but seems limited to triggering flash. Not a problem if this is your aim. The PW plus 2 units will do remote cameras too but don&#039;t have the hot shoe. The real test is in the field. When I get a chance I&#039;ll get hold of a set and give them a good testing. This is what Will Chung thought of them: http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Pocket-Wizard-Plus-II-versus-the-Seculine-Twin-Link-T2D-12634#Verdict

I hope this helps,

Damien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin, I have no idea what a &#8217;secureline twinlink t2d&#8217; is. My first guess would be a fishing reel. So I had to look it up on Google and WEX came up top. It looks great but seems limited to triggering flash. Not a problem if this is your aim. The PW plus 2 units will do remote cameras too but don&#8217;t have the hot shoe. The real test is in the field. When I get a chance I&#8217;ll get hold of a set and give them a good testing. This is what Will Chung thought of them: <a href="http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Pocket-Wizard-Plus-II-versus-the-Seculine-Twin-Link-T2D-12634#Verdict" rel="nofollow">http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Pocket-Wizard-Plus-II-versus-the-Seculine-Twin-Link-T2D-12634#Verdict</a></p>
<p>I hope this helps,</p>
<p>Damien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-4479</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-4479</guid>
		<description>I have spent tonight checking out Damiens gem on shooting at ISO 800 60th sec at F4 in winter with good results.  Have WEX asked you to test the Seculine Twinlink T2D would be good to hear your views on those.

Thank agin for all your useful info on here.

Regards, Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent tonight checking out Damiens gem on shooting at ISO 800 60th sec at F4 in winter with good results.  Have WEX asked you to test the Seculine Twinlink T2D would be good to hear your views on those.</p>
<p>Thank agin for all your useful info on here.</p>
<p>Regards, Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damien</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin,

The 580 is somewhat easier to use because it has a switch to go between remote and local operation. Why they got rid of it when they made the mk11 version I do not know.

Yes both units can be used together, they have similar power and performance and the practical differences are relatively few.

Here is an interesting comparison article for you:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-580EX-II-Speedlite-Flash-Review.aspx

Regards, Damien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>The 580 is somewhat easier to use because it has a switch to go between remote and local operation. Why they got rid of it when they made the mk11 version I do not know.</p>
<p>Yes both units can be used together, they have similar power and performance and the practical differences are relatively few.</p>
<p>Here is an interesting comparison article for you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-580EX-II-Speedlite-Flash-Review.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-580EX-II-Speedlite-Flash-Review.aspx</a></p>
<p>Regards, Damien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>Hi Damien,

How do you view the difference between 580 and 580II performance wise? Can they be mixed in use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Damien,</p>
<p>How do you view the difference between 580 and 580II performance wise? Can they be mixed in use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinz Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinz Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3345</guid>
		<description>Hi Damien,

I have held off getting a set of PWs until the new ones are released and I&#039;m very keen to see your reports on them.

The guys in the US have it good with their Radio Poppers and I hope the new PWs will provide us with a new creative tool.

Thanks for the reply.
Heinz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Damien,</p>
<p>I have held off getting a set of PWs until the new ones are released and I&#8217;m very keen to see your reports on them.</p>
<p>The guys in the US have it good with their Radio Poppers and I hope the new PWs will provide us with a new creative tool.</p>
<p>Thanks for the reply.<br />
Heinz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damien</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3331</link>
		<dc:creator>damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3331</guid>
		<description>Hi Heinz,

I have to disagree with you regarding the Nikon v Canon thing. The beam pattern of the 580 EX11 is far nicer than the SB900. The SB900 also has a thermal switch off function that makes it unusable for me on workshops. The bomb proof SB800 is my Nikon flash gun of choice.

But I think Nikon have a winner with the CLS (creative lighting system) it is wonderful when combined with the pop up flash. I wish Canon had an equivalent.

So I say both systems have their ups and downs but I wouldn&#039;t choose one over the other without considering the rest of the system.

I do agree with you re 2x 430EX11 over 1x 580EX11.

I have been beta testing the PW units recently and I have to say there were still a few tweaks needed to the firmware but I really do hope the system works well when it is released in the next few weeks or so.

Damien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heinz,</p>
<p>I have to disagree with you regarding the Nikon v Canon thing. The beam pattern of the 580 EX11 is far nicer than the SB900. The SB900 also has a thermal switch off function that makes it unusable for me on workshops. The bomb proof SB800 is my Nikon flash gun of choice.</p>
<p>But I think Nikon have a winner with the CLS (creative lighting system) it is wonderful when combined with the pop up flash. I wish Canon had an equivalent.</p>
<p>So I say both systems have their ups and downs but I wouldn&#8217;t choose one over the other without considering the rest of the system.</p>
<p>I do agree with you re 2x 430EX11 over 1x 580EX11.</p>
<p>I have been beta testing the PW units recently and I have to say there were still a few tweaks needed to the firmware but I really do hope the system works well when it is released in the next few weeks or so.</p>
<p>Damien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damien</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed, 

I agree with you regarding the fiddly process for switching the 580 EX11 between normal operation and master or slave mode.

If you have a new Canon camera like a 5D mk2 or a 1Ds mk 3 etc you can switch an attached 580EX11 into master mode and access all the main functions from the somewhat easier camera menu.

This doesn&#039;t help you if you want to switch a remote flash to slave mode.

Bring back the switch that the original 580 had I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed, </p>
<p>I agree with you regarding the fiddly process for switching the 580 EX11 between normal operation and master or slave mode.</p>
<p>If you have a new Canon camera like a 5D mk2 or a 1Ds mk 3 etc you can switch an attached 580EX11 into master mode and access all the main functions from the somewhat easier camera menu.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t help you if you want to switch a remote flash to slave mode.</p>
<p>Bring back the switch that the original 580 had I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinz Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinz Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>I really do think Nikon beat Canon in the flashgun race and the SB900 has a few features that kicks the 580&#039;s butt. I&#039;m a Canon man myself, and I&#039;ve got both the 430 and the 580, both of which are an essential to my work. 

The 580 is ahead of the 430 by a small margin, but the difference in price is a bit of a joke. I&#039;d rather buy two 430&#039;s for a bit more, than one 580 if I were starting out.

Hope PW does a good job with the new triggers, then the 430s will come into their own.

Cheers
Heinz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do think Nikon beat Canon in the flashgun race and the SB900 has a few features that kicks the 580&#8217;s butt. I&#8217;m a Canon man myself, and I&#8217;ve got both the 430 and the 580, both of which are an essential to my work. </p>
<p>The 580 is ahead of the 430 by a small margin, but the difference in price is a bit of a joke. I&#8217;d rather buy two 430&#8217;s for a bit more, than one 580 if I were starting out.</p>
<p>Hope PW does a good job with the new triggers, then the 430s will come into their own.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Heinz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Salter</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Salter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3321</guid>
		<description>I hate how fiddly the new 580ex II is to put into master mode. What was wrong with a simple switch! Surely it&#039;s not that hard to water proof a switch, going through menus is a real pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate how fiddly the new 580ex II is to put into master mode. What was wrong with a simple switch! Surely it&#8217;s not that hard to water proof a switch, going through menus is a real pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederik</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>Hi damien that not what I meant. I added a hotshoe adapter to my hotshoe.

like this one
http://www.flashzebra.com/hotshoes-shoes/0065.shtml

Very easy solution and still cheaper than a 580II

Ps:be ware of the hama adapters they&#039;re not bad but they don&#039;t seem to get along with a 430II very well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi damien that not what I meant. I added a hotshoe adapter to my hotshoe.</p>
<p>like this one<br />
<a href="http://www.flashzebra.com/hotshoes-shoes/0065.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.flashzebra.com/hotshoes-shoes/0065.shtml</a></p>
<p>Very easy solution and still cheaper than a 580II</p>
<p>Ps:be ware of the hama adapters they&#8217;re not bad but they don&#8217;t seem to get along with a 430II very well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damien</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>Hi Frederik,

I came across this post a while ago in my search for options for adding a sync socket to a 580...

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=256447

It&#039;s not for the feint hearted.

Damien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frederik,</p>
<p>I came across this post a while ago in my search for options for adding a sync socket to a 580&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=256447" rel="nofollow">http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=256447</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not for the feint hearted.</p>
<p>Damien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederik</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotonut.com/2009/07/14/canon-580ex11-canon-430ex11-whats-it-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotonut.com/?p=3050#comment-3318</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually quite easy to fit a pc socket to the hotshoe of a 430 it cost me 20€ extra for a decent one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually quite easy to fit a pc socket to the hotshoe of a 430 it cost me 20€ extra for a decent one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
